![]() In this multidisciplinary context, it is very easy to lack the common semantic ground which makes landscape a unitary and intuitive phenomenon for people, before being analytically framed into different disciplines. Over the past decades, scientific research on landscape “in psychology, sociology, geography, medicine, planning, philosophy, archaeology, and environmental research has intensified causing clear differentiation in the formation of landscape-theoretical approaches” (Kühne 2019, p. Landscape is a complex and somehow ambiguous concept too. But, despite its popularity, it draws on a simplistic distinction between the objective (space) and the subjective (place), which does not take sufficient account of their reciprocal and constitutive connections. Agnew confirms this idea by affirming that: “space is regarded largely as a dimension within which matter is located or a grid within which substantive items are contained” (Agnew 2011, p. According to Low, the second conceptualisation reflects “the most common way that social scientists think about space and place” ( Ibidem). ![]() A third one considers place to be “the larger category encompassing a conceptually limited and more narrowly defined construct of space” ( Ibidem): in this case, objective space is rather seen as a rational abstraction drawing on a prior experience of lived places. In this case, Low argues, space is the objective three-dimensional extension of reality, whereas “place is defined as lived space made up of spatial practices and is phenomenologically experienced, such as the culturally meaningful space of home” ( Ibidem). A second conceptualisation is that “space is the more encompassing construct, while place retains its relevance and meaning but only as a subset of space” ( Ibidem). The anthropologist Setha Low identifies some conceptual patterns of connection between space and place: a first one according to which “they are separate constructs with no overlap” (Low 2013, p. There has been considerable semantic confusion within and across disciplines about the conceptual relationship of space and place. The Oxford English Dictionary gives over about two pages to space and around three and a half pages to place” (Agnew 2011, p. As the geographer John Agnew has noted: “Contrary perhaps to first appearance, space and place are fairly complex words. How does this impact on biodiversity? Your answer should include: Rainfall / Temperature / Infertile / Plants / Animals What are trophic levels (1,2,3,4).Space, place, and landscape are terms of common use, which nonetheless hide complex and stratified meanings. Your answer should include: Precipitation / Weathering / Leaching / Runoff Why does the tropical rainforest have high nutrient cycling. What are the inputs, recycling and outputs of the nutrient cycle. In ecosystems, feeding relationships are shown in food chains. If vegetation is removed, the soils quickly become infertile and vulnerable to erosion. However, as these nutrients are in high demand from the rainforest’s many fast-growing plants, they do not remain in the soil for long and stay close to the surface of the soil. This provides plentiful nutrients that are easily absorbed by plant roots. The hot, damp conditions on the forest floor allow for the rapid decomposition of dead plant material. The rainforest nutrient cycling is rapid. ![]() The nutrient cycle is the circulation of nutrients between biotic and abiotic elements, ensuring that plant life receive elements such as nitrogen, magnesium and potassium.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |